data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72050/720508f678916342291c085a0076f25ccbc569f4" alt=""
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-teachers3-2009may03,0,679507.story
Kathleen Collins, associate general counsel for L.A. Unified, explained it this way: "Kids don't have a union."
Why do California taxpayers--who are footing the enormous education bills--put up with this?
GE's former CEO Jack Welch talked about teachers' unions at a recent Commonwealth Club event in Santa Clara. He said if you support teachers' unions, you're not pro-kids--you're pro-management. He's correct--teachers' unions represent teachers, not children. If teachers' unions cared about children, they wouldn't make it so hard to get rid of under-performing teachers. They'd also give up some of their lavish benefits, which would allow taxpayers to pay new teachers higher salaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment