![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyhor2y8F1xvSRBx3hPksXWu9q-Vc2HmMFF3LPyknaX0Iaxo8zmRfPX1uPX-0axtQ-VoRkkSsIIoZzvrvtNVQieVdf8yqq96rY_kAgRRGTnOYJRMPxb8vtTEx5w7f1nVZ7sct2Mwl13HbC/s400/CurrencyDeval.jpg)
I wish high schools would teach Americans basic statistics and macroeconomics, but with teachers' unions and religious fundamentalists influencing the academic curriculum and refusing to adapt to the 21st century, I don't see much change on the horizon.
Here's a basic tip: when analyzing economic data, you cannot rely on one set of numbers. For example, if someone shows you a chart of income growth rates, such data is meaningless without also evaluating inflation rates during the same time periods. More specifically, if your income rises 3% but inflation rises 4%, you are worse off than if your income rises 2% but inflation rises 1%. That's another interesting question to ask a high school senior--whether you are better off under the former or latter scenario. Again, I bet most of the high school seniors would answer incorrectly.
No comments:
Post a Comment