Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Controversy Ahead: Interview with White Pride Proponent
WARNING: do not read this if you are easily offended or dislike political and racial discussions.
The link to the following interview contains an open discussion about race and could potentially offend people that are sensitive when it comes to such issues. If you fall into that category, I would recommend not reading any further. HERE is an interview with “White Pride” fighter Melvin Costa:
First and foremost I want the people out there not to mix up love for my own with hate for others. I don't hate any other race. I love my own. That's what I'm about pretty much; the advancement of my people, my culture, my heritage.
Is Mr. Costa a racist? Apparently, Mr. Costa has been banned from participating in MMA fights because of his swastika tattoo and/or ideological beliefs. Mr. Costa says he was in prison for many years, and the swastika tattoo stands for the "purity of my people's blood," not hate.
I don't know whether Mr. Costa is a malevolent racist--he never says in the interview that he believes "whites" are superior to anyone else or that he wants laws enforcing racial segregation. He appears to agree with voluntary racial segregation, but does believing in voluntary segregation make him a racist? Keep in mind that most parts of America right now are de facto segregated by race.
Also, how should we characterize people who believe Western culture is superior to other cultures? Would we call pro-Westerners ignorant or racist? Probably not--there are many PhDs and Wall Street Journal writers who are proud of Western culture and who believe it is the best culture. For the most part, pro-Western-culture proponents essentially advocate the superiority of Western culture, which was made by people they consider "white." I sometimes wonder whether the difference between a Melvin Costa and a Victor Davis Hanson is eight years of college, but I know that's a horribly unfair comparison. Mr. Hanson, of course, does not favor racial segregation and does not make comments based on racial pride. Perhaps if Mr. Costa removed his tattoos and talked about his love of Western culture instead of his love of "white" persons, he would become eligible to fight in major MMA events.
I'll leave you with another reader's comment: "I've never understood the concept of being proud of complete genetic randomness." Indeed.
The link to the following interview contains an open discussion about race and could potentially offend people that are sensitive when it comes to such issues. If you fall into that category, I would recommend not reading any further. HERE is an interview with “White Pride” fighter Melvin Costa:
First and foremost I want the people out there not to mix up love for my own with hate for others. I don't hate any other race. I love my own. That's what I'm about pretty much; the advancement of my people, my culture, my heritage.
Is Mr. Costa a racist? Apparently, Mr. Costa has been banned from participating in MMA fights because of his swastika tattoo and/or ideological beliefs. Mr. Costa says he was in prison for many years, and the swastika tattoo stands for the "purity of my people's blood," not hate.
I don't know whether Mr. Costa is a malevolent racist--he never says in the interview that he believes "whites" are superior to anyone else or that he wants laws enforcing racial segregation. He appears to agree with voluntary racial segregation, but does believing in voluntary segregation make him a racist? Keep in mind that most parts of America right now are de facto segregated by race.
Also, how should we characterize people who believe Western culture is superior to other cultures? Would we call pro-Westerners ignorant or racist? Probably not--there are many PhDs and Wall Street Journal writers who are proud of Western culture and who believe it is the best culture. For the most part, pro-Western-culture proponents essentially advocate the superiority of Western culture, which was made by people they consider "white." I sometimes wonder whether the difference between a Melvin Costa and a Victor Davis Hanson is eight years of college, but I know that's a horribly unfair comparison. Mr. Hanson, of course, does not favor racial segregation and does not make comments based on racial pride. Perhaps if Mr. Costa removed his tattoos and talked about his love of Western culture instead of his love of "white" persons, he would become eligible to fight in major MMA events.
I'll leave you with another reader's comment: "I've never understood the concept of being proud of complete genetic randomness." Indeed.
Labels:
MMA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




2 comments:
I'm a bit unclear in what way a Swastika is a symbol exclusive to "white pride." Actually, I'm not clear on any symbol which has exclusive or significant "white" meaning. Perhaps that goes hand-in-hand with the reason you see few examples of people demonstrating legitimate "white pride" -- "whites" don't tend to go through the sorts of struggles (on the basis of their ethnicity) which create them. Lacking those specific sorts of struggles it's not clear what exactly one is demonstrating "pride" in.
One can contrast this with, for example, wearing a Star of David or a swatch of green fabric, which are clearly associated with struggles that a particular group is going through or has gone through.
@Jamie: thanks for your comment! I like the reference to the "swatch of green fabric" :-)
Post a Comment